
Update 11-01-03
Well it has been quite the week for our union and the possible future of
public policy towards aviation safety and the air traffic world. A week
that contained rare events in congressional history, a grossly overt
application of dirty tricks and blatant disregard for rule all of which
removed any remaining pretext of innocent intentions toward our jobs.
I suppose the best way to relate what has
happened, and is happening, is to put this in to context starting with
some recent historical prospective. For those of you activists who can
recite this series of events in your sleep I apologize, but others still
do not seem to know the story and maybe you could ensure that they read
this. Be forewarned though that the moral of this story is going to be
that, starting again on Monday, your leadership will once more be
imploring you to call the 1-866-I-FLY-SAFE number. As tedious as this
may seem, and not to diminish our appreciation of all you have done so
far, it is critical you do so again for us to win this fight. You might
want to have a PAC form handy for the end of this update as well.
1. June 2002: The Bush Administration
amends an executive order stripping air traffic control of its
“inherently governmental” designation.
2. November 2002: White House officials leak a plan to privatize
850,000 federal jobs.
3. February 2003: The FAA's FAIR
Activity Inventory designating air traffic control as a "commercial
activity" is officially released. This is the first time that the FAA
designates air traffic control as anything other than an "inherently
governmental" function. Administrator Blakey claims there are no
plans for further privatization or “significant” expansion of
contracting out.
4. April-June 2003: Administrator
Blakey actively lobbies Capitol Hill and industry leaders against a
bi-partisan initiative in both houses of Congress aimed at reversing the
FAA's "commercial" designation of air traffic control functions. The
intent of the legislation is to ensure the air traffic control functions
are NOT privatized. Administrator Blakey claims again that there are
no plans for further privatization or “significant” expansion of
contracting out.
5. June 2003: The House voted 418
to 8 to approve its version of the FAA bill that included language that
prevents privatization of air traffic controllers.
6. June 2003: The Senate voted
56-41 (with three Democrats absent) to approve Senator Lautenberg of New
Jersey's amendment to the FAA Reauthorization Bill that would provide
protection from privatization for air traffic controllers, flight
service station personnel and the workers who install and maintain air
traffic control equipment. The Senate later voted 94-0 to approve the
full FAA bill, with the anti-privatization language included.
7. July 2003: The Congressional
Conference Committee, chaired by Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska), met to
reconcile the House and Senate versions of the FAA bill. Under pressure
from the White House, the committee abandoned the House and
Senate-approved language that prohibited air traffic control
privatization forever. Instead, they inserted language that protects ATC
for only four years. Worse, the language gave the FAA the green light to
contract out 71 towers -- with the exception of the two from Alaska,
Chairman Young's home state. The backroom deal in the conference
committee was done without a vote or accountability. According to press
accounts, for the first time ever, no member of the minority
party (Democrats, in this case) signed the conference committee report
language. Administrator Blakey continues to claim that there are no
plans for privatization or “significant” expansion of contracting out.
8. July-October 2003: The House
leadership avoids brining the FAA reauthorization conference bill to the
floor because they do not have the votes.
9. October 2003: Abandoning all
pretense that the ideology of privatizing air traffic control is good
for the public, John Mica, chairman of the aviation subcommittee, starts
offering Republican lawmakers exemptions to contracting out for the
towers in their districts in exchange for them removing their opposition
to the bill. This fails to garner enough votes for passage.
10. Last Tuesday: The House votes
unanimously to recommit FAA reauthorization back to conference
instructing the conference committee to meet and fix the objectionable
portions of the bill. This was the first time a bill was sent back to
conference at least since the Republicans gained control of the House.
11. Wednesday: No conference
meeting ever takes place. An obviously pre-written conference report
with the language in section 230 referring to the contracting of the 69
towers deleted but section 105 offering more legal authority to
privatize all of ATC, an even worse outcome for us.
Which brings us to Thursday. The new but unimproved conference bill
went to the floor for debate and a vote. The next four paragraphs I
will shamelessly plagiarize from Pat Forrey’s update since he said it
better than I ever could.
I
think most have heard that the FAA Reauthorization Conference Report was
passed by the House of Representatives yesterday by a vote of 211 to
207, after a prolonged and valiant effort by members of the Democratic
Party to send the Bill back to conference. And many of our friends on
the republican side of the aisle held their ground (and integrity) by
voting against this bastardization of the democratic process, most
didn't... If you didn't see any of the debate on CSPAN, you missed some
very compelling statements by our allies. At one point, Congressman
DeFazio screamed at Congressman Mica for insinuating that the opposition
was merely standing their ground for their special interests groups who
gave money to their PAC's.... DeFazio screamed, "you should be taken
down for those comments..." as the sound faded to silence, and the
debate was suspended. It left me thinking that either DeFazio was having
a heart attack, or a brawl was beginning to break out on the House
floor. In reality, some staffer was running around the Capitol building
dressed in a Halloween costume and carrying a plastic weapon...
I think it's just incredible to all of us that both chambers of Congress
overwhelmingly passed Bills prohibiting the privatization of air traffic
control, yet this fight has culminated in removing language that does
the complete opposite! And now we are left with what we had prior to
those two Bills passing in the House and Senate... no protection at all;
the administration can start to contract out immediately after the
Senate passes the Bill and the President signs it. Furthermore, section
105 changes the statute (Title 49) allowing a "private entity" to
contract an air traffic facility. This will be very damaging in our
lawsuit against the FAA, and I'm sure, a hill that our colleague Marion
was and is prepared to die on. Talk about dirty politics? This is one
great example of why the American public is so apathetic and distrustful
with Washington and politicians...
BUT IT'S NOT OVER YET!!!! There is a very good chance that Senator
Lautenberg will perform a filibuster when the Conference report hits the
Senate floor. This will preclude the Senate from acting on a vote until
he gives up the floor (once recognized). The operative motive is to get
the Senate to reconsider the conference report and send it back to
conference, where the anti privatization language can be reinstated into
the Bill. Otherwise, the Senate cannot act on any other legislation. SO
WHAT CAN YOU DO?????
We need every member to call 1-866-I-FLY-SAFE from the time you read
this message until the time there is a resolution to this Bill, telling
your Senators (democrats and republicans) that you want them to vote NO
on the Conference report for Vision 100, the FAA Reauthorization Bill.
Tell them you want the report sent back to conference to reinstate anti
privatization language back into the Bill. Know this as well... our
consultants are reprogramming the 866 number, so the line may take you
to a House members office. If that happens, you can either thank the
member for their support, tell them how disappointed you are (if they
voted for passage), or you can tell them you have the wrong number and
call the Senate offices directly; we should have this problem corrected
by Monday at the latest. In any event, call the Senator's office and
make sure your spouse, significant other, parents, grandparents,
godparents, friends, and neighbors call too...
The situation we are seeing is a classic... the vast majority of our
Congressional representatives do not want to see the privatization of
ATC. But because we have an oligarchy running this country, many will
bend to follow party lines. The amount of arm twisting, and out and out
threats made to many of our representatives on the republican side of
the isle by their leadership is astounding. This is no exaggeration...
representatives who are going to be in tight elections next year were
told they could expect no help from the GOP if they voted against the
President's wishes; many were told that funding they wanted for their
districts was not going to be there unless they voted for passage of
this Conference report. Indeed, there are significant benefits to
aviation and our country in this Bill, and the leadership is using that
hammer to force members into siding with the administration.
Unfortunately, the result is a bastardization of separation of powers
among the three branches of government, which was set up to stop this
type of tyranny... So think about who you vote for next time around; a
divided government surely produces a moderate result and small change,
but the benefits of fair participation and democracy will always
outweigh extremism.
Okay I’m back and I am
saddened to say that none of the Republican members of congress from the
states in the central region voted against this bill. It’s hard to
articulate the amount of pressure being applied to moderate Republicans
to vote to ensure that the authority to do something that the
administration claims they have no intention of doing remains in this
bill, and the Republicans that did vote their conscience did so at great
political peril. Anyone with half a gnat’s brain can see the White
House is very serious about coming after us.
So we need you to call
1-866-I-FLY-SAFE more this week. The Senate Republicans will be under
tremendous pressure as well and your calls not only let them know how
their constituents feel (the very essence of grassroots activism) but
also help provide them with political cover to go against the threats of
the White House and the their own leadership. Unfortunately, being on
the side of right is not enough and they need your help with this. All
of the calls you have previously made were not directed at this phase of
the process and you need to call often and encourage others to do so as
well.
In closing I want to
express my thanks for the help that many of you have given to this most
important issue in our Unions history. Even if there is not immediate
action in contracting or privatizing, a loss on this will embolden the
FAA administration in their efforts to sabotage our contract, working
conditions and reclass pay. Calling this number as asked is the
smallest request for activism and will take about three to six minutes
of your day to cover both of your Senators (we especially need help in
Iowa, Nebraska and Kansas). But if you still can’t bring yourself to
that small level of action I will say that although I can’t fathom your
reasoning I will respect your opinion with one small caveat. If we lose
this and some or all of the potential negatives become reality I would
ask that you show some respect to your brothers and sisters who did
fight, and not grumble or carp about how bad things are. Not one damn
word! For it will be in no small part your fault it has occurred and
frankly you won’t have the right to complain.
If any body wants to take a
more active role or needs to find a PAC form or just wants more info,
talk to your FacRep or legislative rep(s) or if that doesn’t work,
contact John or me directly and we’ll be happy to help.
Grant Anderson
ganderson@natca.org
1-800-266-0895 pin #50501
|