
Update January
25th, 2004
Congress rolled back in to active session
this last week and the saga of appropriations, including the FAA budget,
concluded for this round. Translation; The Omnibus Appropriations Act
of 2003 was passed in the Senate. It was successfully defeated in a
cloture vote on Tuesday by a coalition of Democrats and some Republicans
angry over provisions regarding nation of origin food labeling (delaying
its implementation), removal of language against the Bush Administration
changes to overtime eligibility, and numerous pork barrel “earmarks”
lavishly added in at the last minute by the Republican leadership during
conference. From a Parliamentary standpoint, opponents could not uphold
the rebellion in such numbers as to force changes by sending the bill
back to conference, so they eventually passed it after numerous “what
are we doing” tirades, some I’m sure very similar to the one I’m going
to launch into later in this update. So this massive $820 billion catch
all bill which funded most of the cabinets and many agencies (including
the FAA funding of $14 billion) passed 65-28 and now we have finally
finished up 2003 funding. But at what long term cost?
Good: With its passage the 4.1%
average raise for Air Traffic bargaining units is funded. The
administration wanted, originally, to thank you for your valuable
service by only by only giving a 2% raise while giving 4.1% to the
military but just like last year Congress, who has the final word ,
voted to keep parity as it should be. What this means is the raise,
backdated to January 11th, will be paid to you in lump sum
once payroll and the fine folks in management in the FAA figure out how
to do this. Maybe you will see this interest free loan to the
Government paid back to you in enough time to help pay for a Valentines
Day party. I myself think it will arrive in a more helpful timeframe
for a Memorial Day party. I hope I’m Wrong. Details of how the raise
breaks down for air traffic BU’s and those BU’s covered under core comp
(the text openly plagiarized from Pat Forrey) will appear at the end of
this update.
Bad: This bill
includes billions upon billions of pure pork earmarks, most added in
under cover of darkness in conference to pave the way for reelection in
districts and grease its passage in congress (it worked). Only one
example benefiting a state in our region is $50 million for a rain
forest habitat in Iowa. Now I’m sure all of the indigenous rain forest
animals and fauna within Iowa will appreciate this gesture, but the $50
million dollars spent on this debacle would pay for over 2000 controller
flat rate moves. And there are billions of dollars in examples of
largess thrown into this bill in conference that were never voted on and
Congress was offered a take it or leave it choice. All your intrepid,
fiscally conservative leaning author can say to this all is, “what the
heck?” In the worst of free spending years of the last several decades,
a big increase in discretionary spending was 3%. This amounts to a
discretionary spending increase of over 8% from a President and
leadership touting how wise they will be with your money. It’s
incredible. While our government budgets are being viciously cut (FAA
is operating in near default with a slew of unfunded or no longer funded
programs), with war in Iraq and new commitments around the globe, and
with deficits reaching unprecedented and frankly undreamed of levels
(remember the huge surplus we started with in 2002?) our leadership is
spending money like drunken sailors and I certainly fear the realities
that the inescapable hangover will bring. This lifelong Republican is
in full head-scratching mode.
Terrible: The
Senate voted overwhelmingly not to back the Bush Administrations changes
to overtime eligibility. That was removed, under pressure from the
White House and without debate, in conference and now with the bills
passage we can expect to see them implemented in rapid fashion. I
detailed most of this in other updates and although the provisions apply
only to the private sector in this law you can expect them to be to be
adopted by OPM soon. We will be exempt as long as our contract (ATC)
says so, but it will be on the table for the next contract negotiations
in a little over a year. Additionally the Congressional leadership
stripped most of the provisions that that were voted in regarding
changes to the A-76 process from the bill (once again in conference
under White House threat) and we can now expect open season on
contracting out after the election year if our leadership remains
unchanged. These are just a couple of examples how parts of this
legislation is not thrilling if you’re one who likes federal employment
or cares about your pay. Are you giving to the PAC yet?
Here, as promised, is the
breakdown of the raise;
The pay adjustments made on
January 11 will be increased retroactively to reflect an Organizational
Success Increase (OSI) of 3.15 percent plus an average locality pay
increase of 1.4%, for a total of 4.55% overall, applied to those
employees covered by the core comp pay system. Broken down this means
that the 4.1% increase is divided into a pay increase of 2.7% and
an average locality adjustment of 1.4%. However, the agency is only
going to pay these employees 85% of the pay increase due to the fact the
agency wasn't completely successful in meeting its goals for the year.
Before, the agency OSI was made up from the annual federal pay raise
plus 1% (from the old step pool). Core comp employees received this in
January. This year however, that number was reduced, in that core comp
employees will only receive 85% of the OSI pool. So, 2.7% (federal pay
raise portion of the 4.1% increase) plus 1% (step pool) would equal
3.7%. However, 85% of 3.7% leaves 3.15% for the total federal pay
raise. If you add the 1.4% average locality pay, the total OSI equals
4.55%.
According to our pay rules,
the controller BU will receive the agency OSI minus .8% or the general
increase plus .8%, whichever is higher. Taking those numbers for our
bargaining unit, we will receive the 2.7% plus an average 1.4% locality
pay adjustment in January, totaling 4.1%, and an additional.8% in PP14
for a total 5% OSI. We will then receive up to an additional .8% SCI
increase depending on our success in meeting the new metrics
negotiated. The time frame for this rating period is from December 1,
2003 through March 31, 2004, so we won’t know how much SCI until the
rating period is over.
Grant Anderson
Pin# 50501
ganderson@natca.org |