
Update 2-29-04
Hello all,
It’s been a couple of weeks
since I wrote last as I have been out of town on business and vacation.
I expected a couple of congressional schemes to come to fruition by now
but most have been delayed.
BACK PAY
As you recall, transportation
appropriations (which include the FAA) was passed as part of a huge
omnibus bill back in January. Our average 4.7% raise was incorporated
in this but because it happened so late, the Presidents initial budget
request stood until this was passed. The president requested an average
4.7% for the military but just 2% for the federal civilian workers (what
you are now seeing in your paychecks.) We will get backpay at some
point (without interest), but not until the President gets around to
issuing an executive order acknowledging the will of Congress, and that
is something he seems to be in no rush to do. The White House cannot
stop the pay raise, but they can be petty and avoid authorizing the
funds for a while. It all seems a bit vindictive to me.
As far as next years raises
the President has proposed 3.5% (I believe) for the military, but once
again a paltry 1.5% for us. This Administrations loathing for the
federal workforce is quite transparent and they are attempting some
tactics to avoid pay parity next year.
Sen. Steny Hoyer, the
minority leader, has led the charge the last several years to follow the
guidelines and give equal raises. This has been with large bipartisan
support but the Bush Administration has shown they are very much opposed
to this and are trying to introduce legislation requiring that any
increase from the Presidents proposal be budgeted for in advance which
would weaken or potentially kill any possibility for pay parity to be
enforced. As a life long Republican, I am really getting disillusioned
with this Administrations ideologically driven disdain for all of us
federal employees, regardless of position or function.
ATO
The new Air Traffic
Organization, which was authorized years ago by a Clinton executive
order (yea, the one that used to say “an inherently governmental
function”) is definitely taking form at the DC level and the various
regions are busy alternating between preparing for and fretting about
it’s scheduled implementation at our level in July. The massive central
service area will be headed on the enroute side by the intrepid Herman
Lyons (sorry ZKC, we sure could have done better) and probably by Nancy
Shelton on the terminal side (we sure could have done worse). I
already wrote some about the challenges this will present on the LMR
side with NATCA but it’s even harder to predict the impact at the local
level. Russ Chew, the guy who was brave enough or foolish enough,
depending on your perspective, to accept the job as CEO, is by all
accounts a fine individual taking bold steps to accomplish the reforms
necessary to get the middle and upper portions of the FAA in line to
really actually support (as opposed to just create paperwork and speed
bumps for) the product the air traffic field facilities put out and work
proactively with our customers. The question is whether he will really
get the support of Marion Blakey (whom he reports to) and others to
accomplish these difficult reforms. And remember all the SES’s and
GM15’s who are having there world potentially upturned by all this. I
guess we’ll just have to see.
One final note; apparently
the FAA has been, without fanfare or advanced notice, deciding that only
two allotments will be allowed with our paychecks. I mention this
because we have had some examples where folks with two allotments (say
NATCA vision plan and NATCA PAC) who after adding a third resulted with
the agency dropping their PAC allotment without notice. This reeks of
at best, poor management and at worst, some extremely dirty political
tricks. Please let John Tune or I know if you come across anything like
this in your neck of the woods. |