|

Update December
11th, 2005
This
week was a proud milestone in or Union’s history. The arbitration for
the 11 fired controllers from New York TRACON finally came to an end.
The FAA, after stubbornly refusing to acknowledge the vile wrongness of
their position had their collective sixes handed to them. The
cliff-notes version; the 11 are returning to work tomorrow lead back by
John Carr along with other leaders, activists and supporters. But the
story goes much deeper than that.
* It
is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong – Voltaire *
You’re
employer, as a policy extension of the White House management agenda,
took it upon themselves to attempt to wrongly destroy the lives and
livelihoods of these controllers and their families. Their reason? To
usher along their desired “culture change” which they even admitted
under cross examination. I hope the transcripts are out soon but the
Agency spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to put these poor
souls on the pointy end of their intimidation spear. Fortunately for
us, the Union got an opportunity to present these cases in front of a
neutral arbitrator which allowed us, in spite of (or more accurately
because of, since they made our case under cross examination) a parade
of Agency witnesses (which read like a “Who’s Who” in the FAA), to
highlight in sharp relief how totally unjustifiable and manically
inappropriate their position was. But what the hell, reason, common
decency and operational stewardship don’t seem to be ideas in particular
vogue within the leadership of this agency nowadays, as witnessed in
events across the nation. So why is the legislative guy talking about
wrongful discipline cases? It all ties together;
Remember Congress? That’s the folks who, at least in a statutory sense,
ride herd over the FAA telling them what is appropriate to do. An
interesting word “appropriate” since the muscle that backs up Congresses
guidance is that they control the purse strings of the Agency’s funding
through a process called “appropriations”. Aside from all the other
issues we deal with Congress over, the case of the above NY11 was
something we brought Congress in early on. Many interested members of
Congress from both parties inquired of the Agency their reasoning and
intentions on these cases. To a person, they were all told that the
Agency intended to mitigate this and they certainly weren’t going to
“fire” these people. That took the wind out of our sails a bit until …
surprise surprise … the Agency fired them all! That enraged a good many
members of Congress but a few, somewhat justifiably couldn’t grasp that
the FAA would just flat out lie to them like that and their must be more
to the story than NATCA was letting on. Then the Agency failed in a
most miserably spectacular fashion to even offer a shred of
justification for their callous and egregious actions at the arbitration
hearings, motivating them to quickly enter settlement talks after
realizing their exposure. The story is still getting out to our
lawmakers but the responses I have gotten so far range from disbelief to
fury (in fact, the agency has been giving a collective foxtrot uniform
to Congress on a number of issues). This segues in to;
* If
they can get you to ask the wrong questions, they don't have to worry
about the answers *
The
Agency has been cutting loose with a stream of press releases and events
characterizing its own workforce as lazy, inefficient, overpaid and
obstructionist. Most of this has ranged from misleading to outright
falsehoods. A few short examples in reference to contract negotiations
being: citing grossly over-exaggerated salary figures as the norm for
this profession, insinuating we will be going on strike, claiming we are
asking for raises. These and other attempts initially got the focus off
of the facts but things are starting to turn. I believe a majority of
Congress now sees this for what it is and recognizes the Agency’s
disingenuous efforts. They would also be willing to address this, I
believe, if the FAA succeeds in their not so secret strategy to avoid
good faith bargaining by instead gerrymandering an “impasse” so as to
send their desires to Congress. Here’s the rub; even if a majority of
Congress sees what’s going on and wants to address it, the small handful
of people in the majority party who control the agenda in Congress are
beholden to the White House and its desire not to have its so called
management agenda weakened. For the rank and file members to insist
this be addressed, they need the justification of not just doing what is
right but also the political cover of responding to the requests of a
significant number of their own constituents. This then leads us to;
Fly Us
Safe: Starting on a bright note, I’d like to congratulate Scot Morrison
of LNK and Mike O’Conner of ALO for their leadership in raising their
respective facilities to the newest members of the Central Region 100%
club. Great job guys!
On a
lesser note, this campaign has been going on since late September and we
only have 59% of our region’s membership who have taken a lousy two to
three minutes out of their time to save their own profession. This
whole thing isn’t a Union vs. Management or a member vs. non-member or
left vs. right thing. It really isn’t even a controller thing. It’s an
Air Traffic thing. Each of our jobs hang in the balance and the safety
and integrity of the system, I believe, is at a crossroads dependant
upon the events of the next few months. Please take just a few moments
to log in to
www.flyussafe.com and then take another minute
to call 1-877-FlyUsSafe and let your Senators know this is important.
Below
are the numbers on the email campaign by facility. We really need to
hear more from CID and ZKC.
|
|
100% |
Dec. 8 |
% |
Dec.10 |
% |
|
ALO |
8 |
6 |
75.0% |
9 |
100% |
|
CID |
15 |
3 |
20.0% |
3 |
20.0% |
|
DSM |
25 |
17 |
68.0% |
17 |
68.0% |
|
ICT |
34 |
27 |
79.0% |
27 |
79.0% |
|
LNK |
9 |
8 |
89% |
9 |
100% |
|
MCI |
41 |
42 |
100.0% |
42 |
100.0% |
|
MKC |
11 |
8 |
73.0% |
8 |
73.0% |
|
OMA |
14 |
9 |
64.0% |
9 |
64.0% |
|
R90 |
17 |
14 |
82.0% |
14 |
82.0% |
|
SGF |
22 |
27 |
100.0% |
27 |
100.0% |
|
STL |
39 |
34 |
87.0% |
34 |
87.0% |
|
SUS |
15 |
9 |
60.0% |
9 |
60.0% |
|
SUX |
13 |
10 |
77.0% |
10 |
77.0% |
|
T75 |
59 |
29 |
49.0% |
32 |
54% |
|
ZKC |
279 |
103 |
37% |
107 |
38% |
|
NCE |
601 |
346 |
58% |
357 |
59% |
Call me
with any questions,
Grant
Anderson
417-894-6887
ganderson@natca.org
|