
Central Region Update
for March 14th, 2004
Brothers and Sisters,
REGIONAL STUFF
Another week has passed and a busy one it was. Of course
there are always the last minute grievances that need to be elevated.
ZKC wins the prize with ten grievances elevated this week. Guess what,
they were mostly pertaining to the credit hour issue.
Now my opinion of credit hours is quite different than most.
Believe me I understand wanting to work for credit hours and use it like
additional annual leave. That is all fine and good while the facility
will allow for reoccurring credit hours. But once the manager takes any
advantage away from the controllers then I believe we should say alright
"I no longer volunteer to work for credit hours". Every time you hear a
supervisor tell a controller they are short and have credit hours
available we should file a grievance. If the facility management does
not want to cooperate let them pay overtime.
Lot of information and miss-information about the ATO this
week. I filed a regional information request to get some information no
the ATO. This is so I can better determine the impact of the ATO on the
work force. The Agency has been pretty secretive about the ATO and in a
lot of cases NATCA is finding out on the back side what is going on.
One of the funniest documents I read this week pertained to our ATX
Liaison. This document stated they were extending the ATX Liaison on a
30 day basis and would re-evaluate each thirty days. Must not have
anything else to do except re-evaluate.
There has been a lot going on in the Region. In fact things
are pretty quite from regional management. I think most of them are
trying to figure out if they need to bail off the ship now or wait to
see if any life vests will be thrown their way. Almost feel sorry for
them because they have chosen a path in their career that appears to be
impacted by change. Unlike the operational change we see they are not
used to it.
Of special note, a lot of our members participated in a fax
campaign to Sam Graves and in less than eighteen hours we had made some
head way. I am sure
Grant Anderson will
mention this in his update so I will not go into great detail. I would
like to thank everyone who participated in our democratic process at
work. Thanks.
I will close right there and I hope everyone has a safe week.
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Here is
Grant Anderson's
update for the week.
Well another week passes in the "tropical” Central Region
(Congress appropriated something like $50 million dollars for a rain
forest habitat in
Iowa so I could say that) and the Agency is continuing its
backwards march to ensure that they make the FAA the most hostile
workplace they can. Ya’ gotta’ love their powers of focus combined with
their lack of reason and morality. Oh well, at least they’re being
consistent enough that we don’t have to suspect them of productive
motives. More on this later.
Sups and OE’s
Last week I mentioned the letter that Congressman Sam Graves
(R) MO and Congressman Jim Shuster (R) PA co-authored and were
circulating throughout Congress for signatures. It demanded the FAA
hire more supervisors based on the FAAMA’s justification that the
increase in OE’s was due to not enough sups and an implied failure of
the CIC program. Obviously this was ridiculous and we launched a
Central Region grassroots effort to educate Cong. Graves about this with
phone calls, emails, and lots of documentation disproving the FAAMA’s
absurd claim and culminating in a fax campaign that started Tuesday
night. I’m happy to say that by early evening Wednesday we got word
that they would talk with us, rescind and/or reword the letter and try
to make things right if we would just “call of the dogs”. What sweet
words those were. Apparently all of the Congressman’s staff didn’t
capitulate at the same time, but eventually all were on the same sheet
of music.
Hopefully Congressman Graves and his staff will meet with
John Carr early this next week and with any luck we will have this issue
resolved and the good Congressman back in our good graces. Sam is
really a good guy (I sure can’t say that about some of the people in
Congress) and I will be personally thrilled if we can salvage our
relationship. It took us all by surprise that he would have acted so
prematurely and without consulting us about such unsupportable
statements, but I have high expectations that very soon that will all be
just water under the bridge.
The real story though, is you. We called upon just the
Central Region to take a stand and make our voices heard. And boy howdy
did we! In a remarkably short period of time we turned things around
and all I can say is WOW! ...THANK YOU! What a great example of members
of a Union acting in a unified manner to achieve a
result. And that’s what Union power is all about now isn’t it? The
whole effort is a wonderful paradigm of democracy at work.
If just the Central Region operate this well and achieve all
that, what do you think would happen if all the regions acted together
on an issue? Well guess what? We’re about to find out because a
nationwide grassroots effort on a different subject is about to be
launched.
Contract Negotiations
NATCA has been trying for some time to negotiate contracts
for our other bargaining units in aircraft certification, aerospace
medicine, financial services etc. (there’s a bunch of them). The Agency
for its part has been busy trying to obfuscate, inhibit, ignore and
occasionally just refuse to show up for these negotiations. After their
complete unwillingness to bargain in god faith the issue was brought
before the Federal Services Impasse Panel (FSIP). Unfortunately the
existing FSIP members were basically fired by the Bush Administration
and replaced by administration cronies. When our issues came before
them they ruled that they were unsure if they had jurisdiction (huh? A
federal agency at impasse puts the issue in front of the
federal impasse panel and they’re not sure if they have
jurisdiction?) and remanded it back. This is clearly ridiculous and
NATCA and PASS have filed suit against the FSIP to make them rule on
this. This may be absurd you say but what does this have to do with a
legislative update?
Well the FAA is trying to invoke a clause in the original
authorization language that initiated reclass back in the mid 90s. This
said that if the parties were unable to reach agreement they could put
their dispute before Congress to resolve. But if Congress did not act
within 30 days the last management proposal would be the binding
agreement. The problem is that the wording applied to the original
establishment of reclass and not future negotiations. The FAA is
banking on the fact that Congress will neither call them on this nor act
within 30 days and they can get EVERYTHING they want since they
basically never bargained over anything. We need to ensure congress
takes the right steps.
Why should you care? Well for one these are our NATCA
bargaining unit brothers who will be screwed over in a terrible way if
this should come to pass. Still not motivated? Then consider this; if
this stands, in a year or so when are own contract is
renegotiated the agency could take most everything back, using this as
precedent The contract you enjoy today will be a thing of the past and
your rights and working conditions will whatever the “benevolent” FAA
wants to give you.
We will be activating the grassroots activism network
similar to last week and requesting you make the few mouse clicks it
will take to request action from your Representatives and Senators. We
will ask them to rule that what the agency is attempting to do is
inappropriate or at the very least instruct the FAA to wait until the
resolution of the FSIP lawsuit. Look for this to start soon and folks
remember, this one is of gargantuan importance to your future!
I will get you more info in the coming updates. If you have
questions, please feel free to contact me.
Grant Anderson
Pin# 50501
ganderson@natca.org
417-894-6887
DENTAL PLANS INC UPDATE
On
January 9, 2004 NATCA filed suit against Dental Plans, Inc. (DPI), Mike
and Debbie Davenport (the officers of DPI), and others for claims
stemming from the dental plan marketed to NATCA and its members by DPI
and the American Association of Orthodontists. DPI and the Davenports
have consistently denied any liability for the deficiencies of this
dental plan and have refused requests by NATCA that they and/or their
company contribute the funds necessary to pay off all of the eligible
dental claims that are pending.
It has been recently learned that DPI and/or the
Davenports have been
willing to financially sponsor dinners, golf tournaments, and/or other
activities put on by the locals. The willingness of DPI and/or the
Davenports to financially support these local activities (support which
ostensibly is rendered in hopes of enhancing their business prospects in
those areas) stands in complete contrast to their steadfast
unwillingness to remedy the financial injury suffered by NATCA members
as a result of the dental plan deficiencies.
Locals and members should not seek sponsorship of activities
and not attend events sponsored by DPI and/or the
Davenports; any other
course of action sends an inconsistent message to this company and its
principals. The position that DPI and the Davenports have taken in the
pending litigation is an affront to NATCA and its members. NATCA's
unwillingness to continue to voluntarily associate with this entity and
its principals should be a message that DPI and the Davenports receive
loud and clear from all organizational components of NATCA.
FAA
CONSOLIDATIONS
NATCA has recently discovered the FAA is planning on
consolidating the OEAAA functions from the regional offices to a central
location in the
Dallas
regional office. OEAAA is basically obstruction evaluation of objects
that effect US airspace from Cranes at an airport to transmission towers
in the middle of nowhere. This function is performed in some of the
regional office by covered by 2152's. This is not the case in all
regions.
Apparently the FAA did not believe there was any impact to
bargaining unit members. Rumors are that the FAA had numerous closed
door meetings pertaining to this issue. With the formation of the ATO
and the lack of respect from current administration (Administrator)
these types of activities will most likely continue. If you hear any
rumors about this type of activities please let me know.
ATX UPDATE
The agency has produced a floppy disc to NATCA regarding our previous
Information Request regarding the total number of TMCs nationwide. We
are currently reviewing the disk to verify that it meets our needs per
our Information Request.
NATCA has submitted U-1 regarding the National Air Traffic Professional
(NATPRO). POCs are Kim/Hull/King/Gancel.
The Parties have agreed to and signed an MOU regarding DSR Software
Change BCC-23. LR POC is Kim, S&T POC is Troy.
NATCA has notified the agency that we have withdrawn grievance number
NC-LR-04-0005-NAT, regarding the voluntary leave donation program. POC
is Taylor.
NATCA has filed a national grievance regarding the agency's failure to
comply with existing upgrade MOUs and process the upgrade for Atlanta
Large TRACON (A80) to ATC-13. POC is Kim.
NATCA has submitted an Information Request regarding the ATO
Reorganization. POC is Levine.
NATCA has requested an Article 7 meeting regarding the agency's intent
to implement RVSM between FL 290-410 (inclusive). LR POC is Rosario,
S&T POC is Entis.
The agency has written a letter to NATCA regarding consolidated TRACONs.
The letter states that since the number of these TRACONs has increased
in recent years they are considering the development of a formula to
determine a consolidated TRACON staffing standard to each facility's
unique situation and circumstances. They state that they are sending a
team to the New York TRACON to observe the operation and to interview
NATCA leadership and members of the BU to gain necessary perspective.
The tentative date for this visit is Wednesday, April 14. They further
state that upon completion of this effort, the team may deem it
necessary to conduct additional fact-finding visits to other
consolidated TRACONs.
The agency has notified NATCA that they are going to implement immediate
changes to FAAOs 7110.65 and 7210.3 due to National Security Concerns.
The changes will address phraseology, notification procedures and
contingency plans during a threat or attack from Man Portable Air
Defense Systems (MANPADS).
The agency has notified NATCA that the ATS Management Board has been
reviewing the cost and effectiveness of the use of ATS personnel as
union liaisons and representatives. The letter states that pending
completion of this review, the decision has been made to extend the
NATCA liaison position to ATX for an additional thirty days. They
further state that this position may continue to be extended on a
month-by-month basis.
NATCA has notified the agency that Mr. Alan Weaver, the current Article
48 representative for the User Request Evaluation Tool (URET), will be
returning to his facility on March 19, 2004. NATCA will not be
backfilling this position at this time. The letter further states that
after the March 19 date, the URET POC will be Jim Ashe, the AOZ
Liaison. POCs are Fralick/Hull.
The agency has agreed with my request to have the printer provide a
complete "proof" of the CBA prior to them printing it in book form.
When the "proof" is received from the printer, we will review it again
for correctness and clarity prior to us giving them the go ahead to
print it in book form. POC is Hull.
The following meetings/briefings were scheduled this past week: 1. On
Monday, there was a meeting regarding our Arbitration on Stand Alone
Weather Sensor (SAWS). This meeting was cancelled by the agency. LR
POC is Ryan, S&T POC is Walton/King. 2. On Tuesday, there was a meeting
scheduled to continue the word-by-word review of the CBA prior to it
going to the printer for the contract extension. The agency's designee
called in sick, therefore the meeting did not take place. POC is Hull.
3. On Wednesday, the Parties met to continue the word-by-word CBA
review. POC is
Hull.
Next week the following meetings/briefings are scheduled:
1. On Tuesday and Wednesday I am scheduled to meet with the agency's
designee to continue the CBA review. We expect to conclude sometime
Wednesday afternoon provided there are no further unforeseen
circumstances. POC is Hull.
NEXT WEEK
I will be in
Washington D.C. next
week. If you need assistance please page me PIN#12001, email me jtune@natca.org
or call 913-294-2861. Have a safe week.
In Solidarity,
John R. Tune |